Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanitary garden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 16:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Sanitary garden

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sanitary garden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is sourced mostly to the organisation’s own website. The references in mainstream media are sparse and overall this looks like a site of local interest rather than a place that meets our notability guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep in the version I worked on, there were three independent sources and no references (other than an external link) from the organization's site. Perhaps the nom meant to say the text was sourced form the organization's site? The refs are decent and establish GNG. I added one more, and applied TNT to the unsourced portions of the article.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
• Comment yes indeed I meant that most of the article’s text is only sourced from the organisation’s own website. The refs in the article show that the place exists and has some local notability but they don’t support most of what was included in it. I agree your edits improve it considerably. Mccapra (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep Unique museums should be included in an encyclopedia. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 06:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment it isn’t a museum. Mccapra (talk) 08:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - meets GNG through significant coverage in national newspapers Times of India [1] and The Tribune (Chandigarh) [2]. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.